Odd Economics
First of all, there’s the Shard.
It is not in a good neighborhood and, for a building intent on promoting finance, it is not in the City.
I got pretty close to it from London Bridge’s station’s platform 6, which takes you straight to Charing Cross.
From there, you get a glimpse of the glass behemoth, and you can't help but be taken aback by the fact that the thing looks a) unfinished, and b) empty.
As is the case with many European cities today, there is an overabundance of empty office space, and London is not the exception.
According to FT, “In a survey of the industry by CBRE, the world’s largest property fund by assets, three-quarters of banks with a presence in London said that they were planning to cut the amount of office space they used.”
And according to The Telegraph, in 2009: "Approximately 11.9% of City offices are vacant – equivalent to 10 large city towers – up by a tenth already in 2009 and more than double the 5.2pc prior to the onset of the credit crisis in 2007, as increasing numbers of businesses collapse or downsize.”
So it would appear that another glass tower is not really what London needs.
Second of all, my trip to London also informed me of the fact that the city is living trough a construction boom.
A friend of ours who lives in the area said he was appalled at all the construction and mentioned how these days, most of those properties are being snapped up by wealthy foreign nationals, who will be in the UK for, maybe, a week per year, and city types who commute into and out of Canary Wharf, but never set foot in the area.
And according to Londonist magazine, this boom is only helping to make property even more expensive: “Average asking prices in London have gone past the £500,000 mark for the first time, and Camden has joined Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea as a borough where average prices are over £1m.
I wonder about how healthy this is for a country.
On the other hand…
During my stay, I also met with a couple of friends. They corroborated this idea about London’s average housing prices being too steep, especially for a country where average wages are around £26,000.
Some can, no doubt, but most people, most Londoners, cannot.
On that subject, we talked about recent studies which mentioned how, it is now becoming very obvious, that all the wealth being created in the City of London is not filtering downwards.
However, all that wealth being amassed there is not percolating down to the rest of the country.
In fact, a large proportion of it is not even taxable, thanks to the UK’s myriad of legal and financial loopholes and tax havens (Gibraltar, Channel Islands, etc etc etc).
London might be one of the planet's financial capitals, but if you are living outside of London, in a council estate, how is that benefitting you and your family?
None of this is illegal, of course (because politicians pass the laws which benefit their friends), but is it ethical?
Desirable?
A really bad precedent...
In Spain, meanwhile, people often like to bring up the example of Mr. Álvarez Cascos, PM's Aznar's Development Minister who, a few years ago, when asked why property in Spain was so expensive, replied "if it is expensive it is because Spaniards can afford it".
What he was trying to say was that he was proud that property was expensive because it meant the Spanish were doing well.
This was before the Conservative party lost the 2004 elections and Spain was hit by an economic crisis from which the country has yet to emerge.
Unfortunately for Mr. Álvarez Cascos, as well as for Mr. Cameron in the UK, most citizens were not so rich that they could afford a property.
In Spain this meant that banks took advantage of people, prices were inflated, and the property boom turned into a bubble which burst.
It meant that property for lower middle class, and middle class families, suddenly went up in price, and many people, as is the case in the UK, were priced out of the property market.
It means that, given Spain's anachronistic mortgage and property laws, you may turn your property's keys to the bank, and it may sell it, but you will still own the bank whatever was left on your mortgage.
It means that many people are being made homeless even today in Spain, while the Government looks on.
It means that many immigrants left the country, the home they bought, and their debt, in Spain and went back to where they came from.
All of this points to Spain's failure, especially since Madrid, unlike London, is not so international a city that many Russian or Middle Eastern investors are willing to pay half a million Pounds (or the equivalent in Euros) on average for the privilege of having a property there (although they will pay this much for property on the Costa del Sol, but that's a different story).
In the UK, where this has happened in the past, what is happening is that people are slowly being forced to move elsewhere. In many instances outside of London.
It is not a crazy idea to suggest that in the not-too-distant-future, London will be a half empty city where a lot of rich people don't live, and a lot of crime takes place.
Is this really what the British Government would like?
And before anyone says 'but what can they do', let me just say, if you are the Government and you don't know what to do, then you shouldn't be the Government.











